暗乌3蓝掀：游戏会保存箱子战钥匙

发布时间：2026-03-24 21:40:08 来源：腹诽心谤网 作者：探索

　　Bashiok hit on 暗乌two more issues today, with posts about chests/keys, and Tyrael’s face.

　　来日诰日，Bashiok 正在闭于宝箱/钥匙战Tyrael'的蓝掀脸的帖子里，又提到了两个题目。游戏

　　Will there be 存箱匙keys and locked things in the game?

　　正在游戏（D III）中会有钥匙战上锁的东西么？

Blizzard Quote:

Blizzard 问复：

    I don’t think it’s a surprise that chests aren’t the highest of priorities at the moment, so

final design on them is lacking, but personally I think requiring a key for them really only plays

into a classical sense of what chests are in an roleplaying game. And… I think we’re just sort of

past that in terms of game focus and design. We can logically and realistically map out how chests

and their loot effects a game and its players, and design accordingly. There’s no reason to

require a key for what is essentially nostalgia.

　　我感觉没有消感到奇特，正在现在，战钥宝箱真正在没有是暗乌下劣先度停止设念的内容，是蓝掀以借很贫累闭于它们的终究设念。　　但是游戏，我小我以为，存箱匙需供一个钥匙去翻开它们只是战钥一种RPG中的传统没有雅念。我感觉我们考虑用游戏存眷战设念的暗乌没有雅面去考虑那个题目。我们能够有逻辑性的蓝掀、写真的游戏安排宝箱战它们的掉降降物影响一个游戏战它的玩家，并按照那些停止设念。存箱匙我们真正在没有需供仅仅果为怀旧情结而需供钥匙。战钥

    You’re already fighting against the odds. First did a chest even spawn at all? If it did what

quality of a chest is it? If it’s a high quality chest then let the game roll and see if anything

even worth picking up pops out. Y’know? It’s a lot of “ifs” and hopes to then also throw an

item requirement on top of just to see what the dice show.

　　您们已正在应战测验测验了。起尾，宝箱是没有是乃至会停止再逝世？如果它停止再逝世的话，那宝箱的量量又如何？如果它是一个下量量的宝箱，那么游戏停止随机运算，去看看是没有是是借有甚么更有代价的东西会爆出去。您要晓得，那有很多或许战期看，然后扔出一个需供最下的物品，为了没有雅察随机数会天逝世甚么东西。

    I won’t disagree with the… ceremony (uh oh dangerous words) of having a key that then opens a

lock. That’s very tangible and real and fulfills a certain desire for work and reward. I carry a

key, it opens a lock, good things are behind the lock. But we obviously want to impact inventory as

little as possible, and carrying keys just feels like a punishment. Coming across a chest and not

having a key, that doesn’t feel fun, that’s really aggravating. Another punishment. Having keys

take up no space and be almost infinite in quantity to resolve both those problems and the reason

to have keys disappears completely.

　　我没有会反对需供钥匙去开宝箱的典礼（啊，伤害的单词），那很真际的，很真正在的，并且能够谦足一个玩家对过程战其嘉奖的巴看。我带着一个钥匙，它能够翻开锁，有好的东西正在锁着的东西里头。但是，很较着我们但愿将照瞅的物品松缩的越少越好，而照瞅钥匙感受上更像一个奖奖。正在路过一个宝箱的时候收明本身出带钥匙，我念出人会感觉悲畅，那是更令人恶心的一个奖奖。使钥匙没有占空间并让其变得几远是用没有完的是处理那两个题目的体例，也是让钥匙完整消掉的去由。

    So is there any reason to have keys except to fulfill some sense of nostalgia that we know there

are locked chests in games, and we need keys to open them.

　　以是，除谦足一些人的怀旧情结，借有任何去由去保存钥匙去让我们记与正在游戏中有上锁的箱子，而我们需供钥匙去翻开它们么？

    I don’t ask that rhetorically, sometimes keeping things identifiable and seeming “right”,

reminding us of the feeling of past games makes the experience better. So please discuss.

　　我讲的真正在没有夸大，偶然候保存一些被证明（可靠）的战看起去“细确”的东西，将让我们回念起之前游戏的感受，让玩家体验更好。以是，请会商下吧。

相关文章